Is Buffett's Business Model More Lucrative than a Hedge Fund?

Arohan of Arohans's Investing Life thinks so:

The difference is in the business models. A hedge fund manager primarily derives his income from fees. The assets of the hedge fund are owned by investors in the fund and only a part of the growth in the value of this asset works towards increasing the net worth of the hedge fund manager...If you are a superlative investor (like Mr Buffet or like many of the better hedge fund managers), business ownership model of Berkshire Hathaway will generate greater wealth over a long period of time. Sure, running a hedge fund will get you to great riches quickly (adding lot of investors quickly, in the years where the fund does very well, etc), but it is not a superior wealth creation machine over long term" Continue Reading

Arohan has a great site and has sponsored my blog through Entrecard. So, if you found this article through Entrecard please "drop" on his widget.

Charlie Munger Interview

I highly recommend reading everything you can about Warren Buffett's partner Charlie Munger. If you are unfamiliar with him you are in for a treat. He is incredibly intelligent and he knows it -which adds a certain (well deserved) brashness and arrogance to his message. For me this makes him that much more engaging.

Here are some notes from a recent interview. I recommend visiting him at the Berkshire and Westco meetings so that you can experience him in person. I GUARANTEE you'll learn something.

Tonight I got to see A Conversation with Charlie Munger at Caltech in Pasadena. I took some notes on the discussion below. C refers to Charlie Munger speaking, while T stands for Tom Tombrello, the interviewer. These are not their exact words.


C: I love Occum's Razor (Wikipedia). Einstein once said make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. In the field of messy social sciences, use a variety of disciplines and look for a confluence of factors when dealing with "lollapaloozas". (significant and strange events, black swans)

For example, I was fascinated about what made people join Moonies, a cult-like group. It didn't make sense until I ran into Pavlov, who experimented on dogs by pushing them to nervous breakdowns (He did this by locking them in cages and then raising the water level up to mouth height, making them think they were about to drown) . Afterwards, they would act in the complete opposite fashion. This was very similar to one of the Moonies conversion methods: "causing the target to snap".

Continue the Interview

Fwallstreet introduces a fantastic time saving tool.

If you haven't visited Fwallstreet you missing out. Joe writes very well and provides excellents tools and instructions on how to deal will difficult investing topics. Today he offered up a real gem:

Trying to separate the news from the noise? Tired of running all over the EDGAR database? Let your company come to you!

This new F Wall Street feature allows you to subscribe directly to a company's filings with the Securities & Exchange Commission's website. Simply enter the company's Central Index Key (CIK) number below and a feed will be generated with the last 100 filings. As new documents are filed, your feed will be updated."

Visit F Wallstreet to get started. (It's Free)

Home Economics

Americans may disagree about nearly everything, but few contest the idea that owning your home is a good thing...[BUT]Homeownership also impedes the economy’s readjustment by tying people down. From a social point of view, it’s beneficial that homeownership encourages commitment to a given town or city. But, from an economic point of view, it’s good for people to be able to leave places where there’s less work and move to places where there’s more. Homeowners are much less likely to move than renters, especially during a downturn, when they aren’t willing (or can’t afford) to sell at market prices. As a result, they often stay in towns even after the jobs leave. That may be why a study of several major developed economies between 1960 and 1996, by the British economist Andrew Oswald, found a strong relationship between increases in homeownership and increases in the unemployment rate; a ten-per-cent increase in homeownership correlated with a two-per-cent increase in unemployment. (In the U.S., it may be worth noting, the states that have the highest unemployment rates—states like Alabama, Michigan, Mississippi—are also among those with the highest homeownership rates.) And reluctance to move not only keeps unemployment high in struggling areas but makes it hard for businesses elsewhere to attract the workers they need to grow..."continue reading